Business

Samsung Galaxy S10+ hits GeekBench again, Exynos 9820 scores improving

The Samsung Galaxy S10’s launch day is nearing and a quick search in our news section will tell you that a lot of info on it (or, rather, the three of them) has already come to light. Until we get to hold one in our hands, however, every extra detail is welcome and the latest bit is a GeekBench score of the Exynos 9820 version of the S10+.

It’s not the first GeekBench listing to come out, you’ll quickly note – there was the initial one of a Snapdragon S10+ and then an Exynos S10 was also spotted a couple of weeks ago. This latest entry shows improved performance, however, which is only natural as the software is approaching its final state.

GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)

Higher is better


Apple iPhone XS Max
11432


Samsung Galaxy S10+ (E9820)
10387


Samsung Galaxy S10+ (S855)
10256


Huawei Mate 20
9793


Huawei Mate 20 Pro
9712


Samsung Galaxy S10 (E9820)
9570


Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
9065


Samsung Galaxy Note9
9026


OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
9005


Samsung Galaxy S9+
8883

A quick comparison shows that this S10+ posts some 9% better multi-core results than the S10 before it. This lets the Exynos version not only catch up with the Snapdragon one, but even pass it by about 100pts – a generally meaningless difference, but one that will please Exynos fans.

The Exynos version was already significantly more powerful in the single-core test than the Snapdragon one, but the latest result is also ever so slightly better too.

GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)

Higher is better


Apple iPhone XS Max
4777


Samsung Galaxy S10+ (E9820)
4472


Samsung Galaxy S10 (E9820)
4382


Samsung Galaxy S9+
3771


Samsung Galaxy Note9
3642


Samsung Galaxy S10+ (S855)
3413


Huawei Mate 20 Pro
3291


Huawei Mate 20
3284


Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
2429


OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
2376

With so little time left until the Galaxy S10 goes official, we can expect that these results will be the ones we’d get out of final units. Even so, it wouldn’t hurt to wait a few more weeks before passing judgment.

Source | Via